Hacker News
- The Bitcoin Blocksize: A Summary http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=535 90 comments
- Bitcoin Lightning Networks Part I: Revocable Transactions http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=450 7 comments
- GCC and C vs C++ Speed, Measured http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=330 70 comments
- If you didn’t run code written by assholes, your machine wouldn’t boot http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=196 47 comments
- On C Linked Lists (Profiling and Optimizing) http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=168 31 comments
- Superfreakonomics: Superplug for Intellectual Ventures http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=110 4 comments
- Rusty Russel: I ran some quick numbers on the last retargeting period which is roughly a week’s worth. Blocks were full: median 998k mean 818k. http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=591 36 comments btc
- Blockstream Rusty (Dec 22 '15) : " I previously estimated that we would want larger blocks within two years, and need them within three. That still seems a reasonable estimate. " - this is fine .... https://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=564 12 comments btc
- PSA: blockstream really think that blocks aren't full at all and that all is going on pretty well http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=564&cpage=1#comment-347586 31 comments btc
- The Bitcoin blocksize: A summary http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=535 23 comments programming
- POLLOUT doesn’t mean write(2) won’t block http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=437 16 comments programming
- GCC and C vs C++ Speed, Measured. http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=330 7 comments cpp
- GCC and C vs C++ Speed, Measured http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=330 36 comments programming
- On C Library Implementation http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=140 13 comments programming