- Police DO NOT Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone - This Has to Change https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/justices-rule-police-do-not-have-a-constitutional-duty-to-protect.html 9 comments politics
Linking pages
- Uvalde Cops Had No Legal Duty to Act: Cases, Experts https://lawandcrime.com/legal-analysis/enraged-americans-expected-uvalde-cops-to-fight-to-the-death-to-stop-elementary-school-massacre-they-had-no-legal-duty-to-act/ 3913 comments
- The Constitution Gives Gun Owners Greater Rights Than Women | HuffPost Latest News https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/constitution-gun-rights-women-rights_us_5a9ef7e0e4b002df2c5e7080 34 comments
- U.S. judge says law enforcement officers had no legal duty to protect Parkland students during mass shooting - The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2018/12/21/us-judge-says-law-enforcement-officers-had-no-legal-duty-protect-parkland-students-during-mass-shooting/ 17 comments
- Opinion | The ugly origins of qualified immunity - The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/10/26/ugly-origins-qualified-immunity/ 9 comments
Related searches:
Search whole site: site:www.nytimes.com
Search title: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone - The New York Times
See how to search.