Linking pages
- Google+ pseudonym policy lets Google reject names that aren’t “established” | Ars Technica http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/2012/01/google-pseudonym-policy-lets-google-reject-names-that-arent-established.ars?amp%3Butm_campaign=rss&%3Butm_medium=rss 8 comments
- Anonymous touts its own social network: 'Anon+' - CNET http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-20085900-83/anonymous-touts-its-own-social-network-anon/ 6 comments
- Everything Old is New Part 2: Why Online Anonymity Matters – Jillian C. York https://jilliancyork.com/2021/01/14/everything-old-is-new-part-2-why-online-anonymity-matters/ 0 comments
- Google+ pseudonym policy lets Google reject names that aren’t “established” | Ars Technica http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/2012/01/google-pseudonym-policy-lets-google-reject-names-that-arent-established.ars 0 comments
- On Pseudonyms: Transparency And Free Expression Are Not Mutually Exclusive • TechCrunch http://techcrunch.com/2011/09/05/pseudonyms-transparency-free-expression/ 0 comments
- The name game: is Google+ building a cathedral or a bazaar? http://theconversation.edu.au/the-name-game-is-google-building-a-cathedral-or-a-bazaar-2606 0 comments
- Google+ Punts on Kafkaesque Name Policy | WIRED http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/08/google-punts-names/ 0 comments
Related searches:
Search whole site: site:www.eff.org
Search title: A Case for Pseudonyms | Electronic Frontier Foundation
See how to search.