- A response to the "BTC on lightning has just flipped Nano" post. TL;DR: It hasn't. https://vinibarbosa.substack.com/p/lightning-did-not-flippened-this?sd=pf 26 comments cryptocurrency
Linked pages
- Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20130512121847/http:/www.reddit.com/r/cryptocurrency 467 comments
- The Rise and Fall of Bitcoin Maximalism https://www.coindesk.com/layer2/2022/10/11/the-rise-and-fall-of-bitcoin-maximalism/ 34 comments
- Seth For Privacy on Twitter: "Not sure this is a good thing, TBH -- over half of all #LightningNetwork capacity is now controlled by a total of 5 entities (~2,260 $BTC). One of the key concerns with a network like Lightning is that it becomes more and more centralized over time, not less (unlike L1)." / Twitter https://twitter.com/sethforprivacy/status/1542477206672359424 22 comments
- Solana's Master of Anons: How a Crypto Dev Faked a DeFi Ecosystem https://www.coindesk.com/layer2/2022/08/04/master-of-anons-how-a-crypto-developer-faked-a-defi-ecosystem/ 0 comments
Related searches:
Search whole site: site:vinibarbosa.substack.com
Search title: Lightning did not "flippened" this crypto
See how to search.