Adam Schefter on Twitter: "This was a poorly worded tweet that deserves a proper response. It was intended to provide insight into the strategy of Watson’s legal team from its POV. I should have been clearer. As legal experts have explained, a lack of an indictment alone does not mean someone is innocent." / Twitter - discu.eu

Reddit

[Schefter] This was a poorly worded tweet that deserves a proper response. It was intended to provide insight into the strategy of Watson’s legal team from its POV. I should have been clearer. As legal experts have explained, a lack of an indictment alone does not mean someone is innocent. https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1502431088458842119 177 comments 11/3/2022 nfl

Linking pages

Is there anything Adam Schefter could do to get in trouble at ESPN? https://awfulannouncing.com/espn/adam-schefter-anything-do-trouble-fired-espn.html 102 comments
10 Reasons Why The 2022 NFL Draft Will Suck - 10,000 Takes https://10ktakesmn.com/10-reasons-why-the-2022-nfl-draft-will-suck/ 0 comments

Related searches:

Search whole site: site:twitter.com

Search title: Adam Schefter on Twitter: "This was a poorly worded tweet that deserves a proper response. It was intended to provide insight into the strategy of Watson’s legal team from its POV. I should have been clearer. As legal experts have explained, a lack of an indictment alone does not mean someone is innocent." / Twitter

See how to search.

Submit link to: