- [Research Article] "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time." http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/1/3/140216 21 comments statistics
Linking pages
Linked pages
- xkcd: Significant http://xkcd.com/882/ 109 comments
- Still Not Significant | Probable Error https://mchankins.wordpress.com/2013/04/21/still-not-significant-2/ 98 comments
- Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International — CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 95 comments
- Science Forum: Ten common statistical mistakes to watch out for when writing or reviewing a manuscript | eLife https://elifesciences.org/articles/48175 15 comments
- The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis | Scientific Reports https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-20299-z 3 comments
- A response to critiques of ‘The reproducibility of research and the misinterpretation of p-values’ | Royal Society Open Science https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.190819 0 comments
Related searches:
Search whole site: site:rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org
Search title: An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values | Royal Society Open Science
See how to search.