• Some researchers are suggesting that reason evolved for a completely different purpose: to win arguments: “It was a purely social phenomenon. It evolved to help us convince others and to be careful when others try to convince us.” https://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/15/arts/people-argue-just-to-win-scholars-assert.html?_r=1 12 comments 23/6/2011 science
• People Argue Just to Win, Scholars Assert - NYTimes.com http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/15/arts/people-argue-just-to-win-scholars-assert.html?_r=1&hp 4 comments 15/6/2011 philosophy
• Science study says people argue only to win, all reason be damned. Which reveals debate to be nothing more than the intellectual cousin to a physical gang beatdown. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/15/arts/people-argue-just-to-win-scholars-assert.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&src=ismr_hp_lo_mst_fb 5 comments 15/6/2011 reddit.com
• People argue just to win, not to find the truth http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/15/arts/people-argue-just-to-win-scholars-assert.html 134 comments 15/6/2011 cogsci
• People argue just to win: evolutionarily speaking, reason is for winning, not for finding what's correct http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/15/arts/people-argue-just-to-win-scholars-assert.html?_r=1 65 comments 14/6/2011 science
• People Argue Just to Win, Scholars Assert - NYTimes.com http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/15/arts/people-argue-just-to-win-scholars-assert.html?ref=general&src=me&pagewanted=all 2 comments 14/6/2011 reddit.com
• I'm Right, Damn it!! Because I said So! http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/15/arts/people-argue-just-to-win-scholars-assert.html?_r=2&hp 14 comments 14/6/2011 philosophy

Linking pages

Linked pages

Related searches:

Search whole site: site:nytimes.com

Search title: People Argue Just to Win, Scholars Assert - The New York Times

See how to search.