- In-group favoritism is difficult to change, even when the social groups are meaningless, suggests a new study on 5- to 8-year-olds, which found that "mere membership" is sufficient to bring out strong in-group favoritism, however random and meaningless the group assignment is. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/in-group-favoritism-is-difficult-to-change-even-when-the-social-groups-are-meaningless/ 19 comments science
Linked pages
- Some People Who Appear to Be in a Coma May Actually Be Conscious - Scientific American https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/some-people-who-appear-to-be-in-a-coma-may-actually-be-conscious/ 196 comments
- Forced Social Isolation Causes Neural Craving Similar to Hunger - Scientific American Blog Network https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/forced-social-isolation-causes-neural-craving-similar-to-hunger/ 134 comments
- Why Elephants Don't Get Cancer - Scientific American https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-elephants-don-rsquo-t-get-cancer/ 0 comments
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292115001907 0 comments
Related searches:
Search whole site: site:blogs.scientificamerican.com
Search title: In-Group Favoritism Is Difficult to Change, Even When the Social Groups Are Meaningless - Scientific American Blog Network
See how to search.