Hacker News
Reddit
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (Search by title)
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
(Lookup URL)
7
comments, 4
points
[]
science
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (Search by title)
http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
(Lookup URL)
11
comments, 20
points
[]
science
- Why most published research findings are false... (Search by title)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc1182327/
(Lookup URL)
4
comments, 16
points
[]
reddit.com
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (Search by title)
http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124&ct=1
(Lookup URL)
7
comments, 9
points
[]
science
- Are most published research findings actually false? (Search by title)
http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2007/05/dirty_little_secret.php
(Lookup URL)
5
comments, 6
points
[]
science
- Replication crisis - Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (Search by title)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1182327/
(Lookup URL)
3
comments, 4
points
[]
science
- Believe It Or Not, Most Published Research Findings Are Probably False | Big Think (Search by title)
http://bigthink.com/neurobonkers/believe-it-or-not-most-published-research-findings-are-probably-false?utm_campaign=echobox&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook
(Lookup URL)
3
comments, 27
points
[]
economy
- Contrary to previous claims, only 14% +/- 1% of all published research findings are false. (Search by title)
http://biostatistics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/09/24/biostatistics.kxt007
(Lookup URL)
8
comments, 12
points
[]
science
- PLOS Medicine: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (Search by title)
http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0020124
(Lookup URL)
4
comments, 10
points
[]
statistics
- “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False” [PLoS 2005, free full-text] (Search by title)
http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0020124
(Lookup URL)
10
comments, 14
points
[]
science
- Scientific journals prefer to publish positive results and this can lead to false claims ending up being regarded as true facts, finds new research from the Niels Bohr Institute. (Search by title)
https://elifesciences.org/content/5/e21451
(Lookup URL)
37
comments, 952
points
[]
science
- The combination of poor study design, over-reliance on statistics, and incentives for conclusive results has led to such widespread systematic bias that more than half of published research finding in medicine are false. (Search by title)
http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
(Lookup URL)
60
comments, 475
points
[]
science
- Most current published research findings in scientific fields are false and may often be accurate measures of bias. More can be done to account for bias, increasing randomised trials and testing true, rather than non-true relationships before running experiments. Paper published in PLOS Medicine. (Search by title)
http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0020124;jsessionid=c921f681ef3af12caefe43a385515d93
(Lookup URL)
2
comments, 11
points
[]
science